Blog Post #4
Amy Yount
Shugart’s
article was particularly interesting for me because I had a completely
different reaction to Rosie O’Donnell announcing that she was a lesbian. The
focus of the article was discussing reasons why O’Donnell’s coming out did not
see as much media attention as Ellen, and why Rosie saw a great deal of support
for her announcement. The author discussed how Rosie was loved by much of her
demographic because she was seen as a nurturing mother, even though she was
very politically active. However, I have a completely different memory of the
events that surrounded her announcement.
I
am from a small town that has traditional small town values. Growing up, I
remember hearing so much negativity surrounding O’Donnell and her political
views. When she came out as a lesbian, that only provided fuel for the fire.
There was no focus on her nurturing side, or even her comedy. The majority of
the talk revolved around her “liberal politics” and her being a lesbian. So it
was interesting for me to read what the majority of Americans thought about her
coming out as a lesbian, and how the media portrayed her.
The
author argued that even though Rosie came out publically as a lesbian, the
majority of Rosie fans were still accepting of her. This was mainly because a
lot of her viewers were mothers who could identify with her along the lines of
motherhood and raising children. To me, the author is saying that her viewers
could almost overlook her being a lesbian, as long as she put her children at
the forefront of discussion. However, it honestly surprised me that her fans
had such a neutral reaction to her coming out. Especially because, at the time,
it wasn’t quite as popular for celebrities to be so open with their sexuality.
Therefore, views about homosexuality were still pretty negative in some
demographics. With Rosie being a mother, one would think that people would be
even more opposed to her homosexuality and have an even stronger reaction. I
just know that in my corner of the country, I heard things such as “I feel sorry
for her children” and “She just uses her show as a platform for her politics.”
So as I was reading this article, I had a hard time identifying with a lot of
the points made by the author, because it was not consistent with my lived
experience.
Another
aspect of the article was that of the “poster child.” This discussion reminded
me of the article from last week’s class about Ellen and her almost unwanted
status as a poster child for homosexuality. Ellen consistently made it noted
that her show was “not a gay sitcom” and she did not feel the need to use her
homosexuality as a ralying cry. Rosie, on the other hand, seemed to want to
fight to become a poster child. It is my opinion that Rosie wanted to be seen
as a poster child for gay adoption, and she turned herself into one. The article
discussed numerous examples of when Rosie would discuss her children on the
show, and even fought for the rights of homosexuals to be able to adopt. Her
show allowed her the opportunity to discuss these issues on a public forum,
thus almost catapulting her into the status of a poster child. I think this is
one of the biggest issues that sets Rosie and Ellen apart.
But
again, it is interesting to examine why Rosie and Ellen received different
amounts of attention from the media upon their coming out. Rosie is much more
political than Ellen, at the time of Ellen’s coming out. Rosie has a much more “in
your face” attitude, so it would make more sense for Rosie to receive more
attention upon coming out, even though the opposite actually happened. I know that
people around me were more shocked when Ellen came out than when Rosie did, so
again I state that reading this article was very interesting for me, because I
saw how the majority of the public actually felt about Rosie vs. Ellen’s coming
out and how it differed from my lived experiences.
No comments:
Post a Comment