In
the article Politics and the Single
Woman: The “Sex and the City Voter” in Campaign 2004, Anderson and Stewart discuss
the mash up of pop culture, politics, and third wave feminism. The authors address the issues surrounding
women voters and the 2004 presidential campaign in a way that I am torn between
being completely and utterly appalled at how our society has exploited women
and the notion of consumerism, and wondering if it is an ingenious ploy to
force Americans to open their eyes and place more importance on our political
system.
While
I do feel torn, it is disturbing the extent that the media and political
parties went to in order to pursue the “Sex and the City Voter.” It is offensive that so many women were
willing to embrace that label. While the
HBO television show is a hit among many women, it is hard to ignore the
underlying messages that the show distributes.
Viewers follow four women who, despite being successful in their careers
in NYC, still yearn for more, and that more can only be fulfilled through
shoes, designer labels, and men. The
show almost never highlights the success of the women, and if it does, it is
only to illustrate how having a blossoming career is not enough for the
characters. Why do women flock to this show? Why do we want to be placed into
this suffocating stereotype of only caring about our looks and finding a man to
sweep us away?
Although
this is a troubling category, Anderson and Stewart articulate that this is a
category that pop culture and media pounced on when the 2004 presidential
election rolled around. Single women
were a target group to get the votes in and what better way to recruit than
through a popular television show that women believed (or wished) they could
relate to. The rhetoric that surrounded
this voting campaign is what is the most troublesome. Phrases and words like husband, hottest date,
wooed, young, white, and single are all words that bind women to a certain
category. Anderson and Stewart state
that in the view of third wave feminism, many women found this to be
liberating, however it is hard to see how this is freeing and not confining,
especially when the products that were being marketed to this group of women
included thongs and specialized martini’s.
Instead of breaking away from the notion of being easy to win over,
women were demonstrating that they could be bought.
The
concept of votes being bought for labels that women love is an idea that has
filtered through the years and to the Obama 2012 campaign. While President Obama is not selling cute
pairs of underwear or marketing cocktails after himself, he does have designer
items for sale in his campaign store.
Tote bags that have been designed by Vera Wang and special t-shirts
designed by Joseph Altuzarra. While the
t-shirt is listed as unisex, it is being modeled by a woman and is part of the “for
runway to win” campaign. Having high end
designers support a presidential candidate subscribes to the notion of women
band-wagoning behind a designer and therefore a candidate.
What
is the most troublesome about this whole notion of making voting cute and sexy
for women is the fact that politicians and the media think that it is the only
way to get women interested in politics.
Instead of being progressive and forward, the marketing strategies are
reverting back to mentality of the 1950’s.
If something is simple and pretty than a woman can understand it and
want to participate. Forget the fact
that as an American citizen, voting is part of our civic duty. That is a concept that apparently is too
large for women to wrap their brains around.
Instead the media packaged this information and knowledge in an adorable
little bundle and offered the prospect of being sexy like the characters on Sex and the City and the hope that by
voting, you can find your dream man. In the
third wave of feminism we as women are aware that we are being objectified and marginalized and
are okay with it, right? As long as I get
my prince charming all while wearing my designer heels with my designer bag
draped over my arm.
No comments:
Post a Comment